Actualités et appels à contribution | 2017-2018
Conference - Pervasive powers: private authority in the shaping of public policy
June 14th to 16th, 2018 - Université Paris-Dauphine, Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 75016 Paris (salle Raymond Aron)
- Colloque - Traductions en sciences humaines : perspectives historiques
- Colloque - Une autre histoire des modernisations agricoles au XXème siècle
- Journées d'études - Éditer l'histoire des sciences (France, XXe siècle)
- Le CAK fait sa rentrée à Blois
- Journée d'étude - Au-delà des spécificités historiographiques : savoirs, politique et religion dans les monarchies ibériques à l’époque moderne
- Première séance des Débats du CAK saison 8: Que nous apprend le calepin d'un savant ?
- Les Débats du CAK, saison 8 : novembre 2017 – janvier 2018
- Congrès mondial d’histoire économique – WEHC 2021 : la candidature de Paris portée par l’EHESS retenue
- Candidatures aux concours du CNRS 2018
- Journée d'études - Les ingénieurs, des intermédiaires ? Transmission des connaissances et coopération chez les ingénieurs (Europe, XVe-XVIIIe s.)
- Deuxième séance des Débats du CAK saison 8 : Qu’est-ce qu’une institution révolutionnaire ?
- Ateliers du Campus Condorcet : La reconstitution - processus heuristique et/ou objet de médiation ? - Table ronde finale, bilan et perspectives
- Avis de soutenances de thèses (novembre - décembre 2017)
- Journée d'étude - Navigation, pêche et identités maritimes, XVe-XIXe siècles. Perspectives russes et françaises
- Appel à candidatures - Prix de thèse PSL 2018 en SHS
- Le CAK soutient l’Appel de Jussieu pour la science ouverte et la bibliodiversité
- Colloque annuel de l'IFRIS et assemblée générale 2018
- Troisième séance des Débats du CAK saison 8 : De quoi la « technologie » est-elle le nom en 1806 ?
- Roberval au miroir de ses contemporains savants
- Call for application - IFRIS post-doctoral positions 2018, LabEx SITES
- Appel à candidatures - Contrats post-doctoraux 2018-2019, LabEx HASTEC
- Journées d'études - Lo studio delle lingue nella Roma del Cinquecento : luoghi e risorse
- Appel à candidatures - Contrats post-doctoraux EHESS 2018-2019
- Appel à communications - Deuxième colloque de la SFHSH - Histoire des sciences humaines et sociales
- Première séance des Débats du CAK saison 9 : Qu'est-ce qu'une politique de chaires ?
- Bruno Latour au Centre Alexandre-Koyré
- Journée d'études - L'univers en scène
- Appel à participation - École Thématique de l’IFRIS « No(s) futur(s) »
- Colloque international - Politiques et pratiques de l’interdisciplinarité
- Colloque international - Spectres de l’érudition
- Soutenance de thèse - Loïc Casson « De la fourmi à l'atome. Les sciences naturelles vues et vécues par Charles Janet (1849-1932) »
- Deuxième séance des Débats du CAK saison 9 : L'enfant sauvage peut-il accéder à la civilisation ?
- Workshop - Performing and knowing. Experimental and sensory approaches
- Les Débats du CAK, saison 9 : mars - juin 2018
- Appel à candidatures - Atelier doctoral interdisciplinaire EFR/EHESS : « Sciences et savoirs de la Méditerranée au monde »
- Après-midi d'étude - Une histoire de la psychologie par les femmes ?
- Demi-journée d'études - L'historien et la psychanalyse
- Séminaire - Gouverner la sexualité féminine, gouverner la biologie synthétique
- Journée d'études - Mathesis Universalis: historical and systematic perspectives
- Journée d'étude - Études psychédéliques : approche historique de la construction d’un champ disciplinaire
- Appel à candidatures - Maître de conférence en histoire et épistémologie des collections
- Colloque - L’Europe de la logique. Les traditions aristotéliciennes médiévales et modernes en contextes : empires et politiques de la logique
- Journée en l'honneur de Patrice Bret - Sciences, techniques, pouvoirs, sociétés XVIIIe-XIXe siècles, Europe-monde
- Troisième séance des Débats du CAK saison 9 : La biologie synthétique : une science de gouvernement ?
- Quatrième séance des Débats du CAK saison 9 : L'identité humaine est-elle génétique ?
- Cinquième séance des Débats du CAK saison 9 : Peut-on synthétiser l’histoire des sciences en 128 pages ?
- Journées d’études internationales - Le monde de Giovanni Botero : décrire, découper, organiser. Une lecture collective des Relazioni universali
- Conference - Pervasive powers: private authority in the shaping of public policy
- Programme « Professeurs invités » de l'EHESS, 2017-2018
- Journée d'études - Disettes. Rhétoriques, savoirs et régulations de la pénurie (XVIIe-XIXe siècle)
- Demi-journée d'études - Techniques de visualisation et cultures visuelles de l'astronomie
- Journée d'études - Savoirs, santé et pouvoirs à l’époque moderne / Knowledge, health, and power in the early modern world
Convenors
Sara Aguiton (CNRS/CAK), Marc-Olivier Déplaude (INRA/IRISSO), Emmanuel Henry (Université Paris Dauphine/IRISSO), Nathalie Jas (INRA/IRISSO), and Valentin Thomas (Université Paris Dauphine/IRISSO)
Scientific Committee
Sophie Dubuisson-Quellier (CNRS/CSO), Scott Frickel (Brown University), Mathias Girel (ENS/Caphes), Linsey McGoey (Sussex University), Sezin Topçu (CNRS/CEMS)
This conference is supported by the research programs ProPublics and SHS-ENV (funded by PSL Research University), the House of Public Affairs (Université Paris-Dauphine), and the IFRIS.
Presentation
The power of corporate business has been a subject of intense debate and many social science studies since the 19th century. This conference is based on the idea that, not only has this power varied among industries, countries and different periods, but also that the way in which it is wielded has evolved over time. By bringing together scholars from various backgrounds within the fields of history, sociology, and political science, we intend to provide new insights on the multiplicity, depth and limits of the forms of influence that corporations, or the organizations furthering their interests – business associations, think tanks, communication or public relations agencies, foundations, etc. –, have on public policy.
The role of corporate organizations in the shaping of public policy has been a classical subject of interest in sociology and political science. Since the seminal work of C. Wright Mills, Elmer E. Schattschneider, Peter Bachrach and Morton S. Baratz in the fifties and sixties, it has fuelled much research on the interactions between economic, administrative and political elites, on the production of decisions or “non-decisions”, and on inequalities of access to political power. Yet, although these issues have played a key part in the development of sociological and political science studies on issues of power, many of them no longer receive any attention, especially in public policy analysis.
Two main reasons justify revived interest in these issues today. First, multiple reforms, often of neo-liberal inspiration, have undermined or even dismantled whole bodies of regulations, or have set up regulatory tools or instruments that clearly favour economic or financial interests. Some of these reforms have also facilitated the commodification of certain public services, or have strengthened international authorities that are biased towards promoting certain market mechanisms. These trends beg the question of how corporate organizations have contributed to such reforms, and on the benefits that they have derived from doing so. But what effects have the reforms additionally had on the promotion and representation of corporate interests in the public institution arena? How can the multiple forms of big business’ presence within these same institutions be characterized? To what extent do these trends, accompanied by ever greater demands for transparency, also result in more normative power in the hands or corporate authorities, while democratic forms of government are constantly being undermined?
Second, the growth of new approaches such as research on the social production of ignorance, or on health and environmental justice, invite us to consider forms of action and influence of economic actors to whom researchers have paid scant attention until now. These streams of research are fostering interest in the ways in which corporate organizations can affect the production, interpretation and dissemination of certain knowledge, and how they facilitate certain forms of misunderstanding or ignorance on particular problems, thereby influencing the policies that are supposed to solve them.
This – non-exhaustive – corpus of literature can be expected to afford greater insight into how corporate authority has contributed to the neoliberal turn in public policy. It should also account for certain corollary processes, such as changes in the types of knowledge used in public policy, the weakening of nation states in the definition of certain economic, social, sanitary and environmental policies, and the decline of democratic government as it makes way to more authoritarian ways of exercising power.
If we are to understand the nature and modalities of corporate actors’ influence, it is important to examine how they are constituted in the various sectors (chemicals, agriculture, finance, energy, water, health, etc.) and at different scales: local, national and global. One of the aims of this conference will be not only to enable geographic or inter-sectoral comparisons, but also to obtain as complete a picture as possible of these pervasive powers.
Full program and practical information
Registration and access
Registering is mandatory to attend the conference.
Please register before May 31th at this address.
To access the conference, please don't forget to bring an ID in case of security clearance by the university staff.
Document(s) à télécharger
Centre Alexandre-Koyré
UMR 8560 EHESS/CNRS/MNHN
Campus Condorcet / bât. EHESS
2 cours des Humanités
93322 Aubervilliers cedex
France